{"id":305,"date":"2020-11-07T12:26:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-07T11:26:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/?p=305"},"modified":"2020-11-10T12:27:56","modified_gmt":"2020-11-10T11:27:56","slug":"petr-kramny-by-mel-s-obnovou-rizeni-uspet-rika-uznavany-byvaly-soudce-judr-pavel-kucera","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/2020\/11\/07\/petr-kramny-by-mel-s-obnovou-rizeni-uspet-rika-uznavany-byvaly-soudce-judr-pavel-kucera\/","title":{"rendered":"Petr Kramn\u00fd by m\u011bl s obnovou \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed usp\u011bt, \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 uzn\u00e1van\u00fd b\u00fdval\u00fd soudce JUDr. Pavel Ku\u010dera"},"content":{"rendered":"

 Uzn\u00e1van\u00fd b\u00fdval\u00fd soudce a m\u00edstop\u0159edseda Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky, p\u0159edseda trestn\u00edho kolegia Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cR, poskytl Spolku \u0160alamoun rozhovor v souvislosti s podan\u00fdm n\u00e1vrhem na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v trestn\u00ed v\u011bci Petra Kramn\u00e9ho. 

JUDr. Pavel Ku\u010dera je sympatizantem Spolku \u0160alamoun a pro Spolek \u0160alamoun je obrovskou autoritou v oblasti lidsk\u00e9 i pr\u00e1vn\u00ed.<\/strong> V\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane doktore, velmi pozorn\u011b, spolu s n\u00e1mi, sledujete trestn\u00ed v\u011bc, dnes ji\u017e odsouzen\u00e9ho Petra Kramn\u00e9ho. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n


Ve sv\u011btle v\u0161ech a zejm\u00e9na nov\u00fdch skute\u010dnost\u00ed, dovolte p\u00e1r ot\u00e1zek:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

1. V jak\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech a za jak\u00fdch podm\u00ednek lze podat n\u00e1vrh na obnovu pravomocn\u011b skon\u010den\u00e9ho trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Odpov\u011b\u010f d\u00e1v\u00e1 p\u0159\u00edmo z\u00e1kon, tak\u017ee jej budu jen parafr\u00e1zovat. N\u00e1vrh na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed by m\u011bl obsahovat nov\u00fd d\u016fkaz, jeho\u017e z\u00e1va\u017enost je tak vysok\u00e1, \u017ee by s\u00e1m o sob\u011b nebo i ve spojen\u00ed s d\u016fkazy u\u017e proveden\u00fdmi mohl zpochybnit, ne-li p\u0159\u00edmo zm\u011bnit, v\u00fdsledek dosavadn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n


2. Kolik obnov \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed jste jako soudce za svoji praxi povolil Vy?<\/strong>

Nepamatuji si na \u017e\u00e1dnou, z\u0159ejm\u011b jsem soudil tak dob\u0159e, \u017ee to nem\u011blo chybu, a nikdo nena\u0161el \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd nov\u00fd d\u016fkaz, kter\u00fd by m\u00e9 d\u00edlo by\u0165 jen zpochybnil.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n


3. Pro\u010d nejsou obnovy \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed povolov\u00e1ny \u010dast\u011bji a pro\u010d se soudy k t\u011bmto n\u00e1vrh\u016fm stav\u00ed p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b odm\u00edtav\u011b?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n


Na tuto ot\u00e1zku nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt odpov\u011b\u010f jednozna\u010dn\u00e1. Na jedn\u00e9 stran\u011b je proces nastaven tak, \u017ee jde o pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed procesu, kter\u00e9 povede soudce, kter\u00fd u\u017e vedl \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, kter\u00e9 skon\u010dilo odsuzuj\u00edc\u00edm rozsudkem. M\u00e1 to logiku v tom sm\u011bru, \u017ee u\u017e je s trestn\u00ed v\u011bc\u00ed sezn\u00e1men a nemus\u00ed znovu v\u0161echno studovat. Na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b by nem\u011bl b\u00fdt zat\u00ed\u017een t\u00edm, \u017ee u\u017e jednou rozhodl, a \u017ee nebude toto rozhodnut\u00ed m\u011bnit. Rozhodl toti\u017e na z\u00e1klad\u011b d\u016fkaz\u016f, kter\u00e9 z\u0159ejm\u011b nebyly \u00fapln\u00e9, proto\u017ee n\u00e1vrh na obnovu obsahuje d\u016fkazy nov\u00e9, kter\u00e9 d\u0159\u00edve neznal. Tak zn\u00ed nepodjatost, realita je ov\u0161em jin\u00e1 a soudce u\u017e ze cti\u017e\u00e1dosti b\u00fdv\u00e1 p\u0159i obnov\u011b \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, respektive u\u017e p\u0159i jej\u00edm povolen\u00ed, neobjektivn\u00ed. Za tohoto stavu lze p\u0159ipustit, aby v\u011bc soudil n\u011bkdo jin\u00fd, ale tam je zase na z\u00e1vadu to, co jsem uvedl \u00favodem. Prodleva, a \u010dasto zna\u010dn\u00e1, spojen\u00e1 se studiem obs\u00e1hl\u00e9ho spisu.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

4. Syst\u00e9m je nastaven tak, \u017ee n\u00e1vrh na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed posuzuje a rozhoduje o n\u011bm p\u0159edseda sen\u00e1tu nal\u00e9zac\u00edho soudu. Nem\u011blo by pr\u00e1v\u011b a p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm u n\u00e1vrhu na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, kter\u00fd je jedn\u00edm z (mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u00fdch) opravn\u00fdch prost\u0159edk\u016f platit, \u017ee by je m\u011bl posuzovat jin\u00fd soudce, kv\u016fli mo\u017en\u00e9 osobn\u00ed podjatosti – jeho vztahu k projedn\u00e1van\u00e9 v\u011bci, kdy soudce nem\u00e1 z\u00e1jem p\u0159ipustit, \u017ee jeho p\u0159edchoz\u00ed pravomocn\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed bylo mo\u017en\u00e1 chybn\u00e9?
<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Proto\u017ee z\u0159ejm\u011b i u jin\u00fdch soudc\u016f plat\u00ed to, co jsem uvedl o sob\u011b na ot\u00e1zku \u010d.3, i kdy\u017e odpov\u011b\u010f na tyto dv\u011b posledn\u00ed ot\u00e1zky m\u016f\u017ee zn\u00edt jako lehkov\u00e1\u017en\u00e1, ale skute\u010dnost je takov\u00e1, \u017ee po d\u016fsledn\u00e9m shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f a jejich proveden\u00ed se jen t\u011b\u017eko hled\u00e1 n\u011bco, co nebylo d\u0159\u00edve zn\u00e1m\u00e9. A pokud se n\u011bco najde, respektive se s n\u011b\u010d\u00edm nov\u00fdm p\u0159ijde, je to nev\u011brohodn\u00e9 na prvn\u00ed pohled. Jako p\u0159\u00edklad m\u016f\u017eu uv\u00e9st t\u0159eba pokus o obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed Ji\u0159\u00edho Kaj\u00ednka, kdy jako d\u016fvod pro obnovu m\u011blo j\u00edt o sv\u011bdectv\u00ed odsouzen\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka, kter\u00fd si po deseti letech vzpomn\u011bl na to, co z oken Borsk\u00e9 v\u011bznice vid\u011bl.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n


5.  Sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed je i n\u00e1mitka podjatosti p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b Gilov\u00e9, mysl\u00edte si, \u017ee by se m\u011bla z \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed vylou\u010dit?
<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            N\u00e1mitka podjatosti p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b sen\u00e1tu Gilov\u00e9 sm\u011b\u0159uje k jej\u00edmu vylou\u010den\u00ed z p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9ho projedn\u00e1n\u00ed obnovy \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed a z hlediska v\u00fdsledku p\u0159edchoz\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed je pochopiteln\u00e1, a bylo na m\u00edst\u011b se o jej\u00ed vylou\u010den\u00ed pokusit. Na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b v\u0161ak m\u00e1m za to, \u017ee tento pokus \u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00fd nebude, proto\u017ee v\u00fdsledek \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v podstat\u011b ztvrdily v\u0161echny nad\u0159\u00edzen\u00e9 soudy, ani\u017e by nal\u00e9zac\u00edmu soudu, jemu\u017e p\u0159edsedala Gilov\u00e1, n\u011bco vytkly.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n


6. V p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b Petra Kramn\u00e9ho vy\u0161lo v roce 2018, tedy a\u017e po skon\u010den\u00ed procesu najevo, \u017ee jeden z pil\u00ed\u0159\u016f \u0159et\u011bzce nep\u0159\u00edm\u00fdch d\u016fkaz\u016f – p\u0159episy odposlech\u016f, p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00edk Policie \u010cR kpt. Alois Kubiena z\u010d\u00e1sti upravil a z\u010d\u00e1sti zcela zfal\u0161oval. Za\u017eil jste za svou kari\u00e9ru soudce n\u011bkdy p\u0159\u00edpad, kdy p\u0159episy odposlech\u016f policista takto sv\u00e9voln\u011b pozm\u011bnil a zfal\u0161oval?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            To je o n\u011b\u010dem jin\u00e9m. V odpov\u011bdi na p\u0159edchoz\u00ed ot\u00e1zku jsem rekapituloval stav, kter\u00fd byl d\u00e1n z d\u016fkaz\u016f proveden\u00fdch a hodnocen\u00fdch do pravomocn\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed. V p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b uveden\u00e9m v t\u00e9to ot\u00e1zce jde o n\u011bco nov\u00e9ho, co vy\u0161lo najevo a\u017e po tomto rozhodnut\u00ed. S\u00e1m jsem nic podobn\u00e9ho neza\u017eil, proto\u017ee odposlech\u016fm, a t\u00edm sp\u00ed\u0161e i p\u0159epis\u016fm, nebyl p\u0159ikl\u00e1d\u00e1n takov\u00fd d\u016fkazn\u00ed v\u00fdznam jako v sou\u010dasnosti. Odposlechy slou\u017eily p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm k zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed d\u0159\u00edve nezn\u00e1m\u00fdch d\u016fkaz\u016f, a procesn\u00ed formou mohly b\u00fdt tyto d\u016fkazy potom provedeny.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

7. Je d\u016fkazem i p\u0159epis odposlechu nebo jen vlastn\u00ed odposlech – zvukov\u00fd z\u00e1znam? Je nutn\u00e9 tento d\u016fkaz prov\u00e9st jeho p\u0159ehr\u00e1n\u00edm a poslechem p\u0159i hlavn\u00edm l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed? <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            D\u016fkazem by m\u011bl b\u00fdt jen vlastn\u00ed zvukov\u00fd z\u00e1znam odposlech\u016f. Proto\u017ee se ale nahr\u00e1v\u00e1 v\u0161echno a zvukov\u00e9 z\u00e1znamy trvaj\u00ed \u010dasto mnoho a mnoho hodin, za\u010dalo se vyu\u017e\u00edvat jejich p\u0159epis\u016f. Pokud ob\u017ealovan\u00fd, respektive jejich obh\u00e1jci, znaj\u00ed obsah vlastn\u00edch odposlech\u016f a nevid\u00ed mezi nimi a jejich p\u0159episy rozpor, nen\u00ed to probl\u00e9m. Pokud v\u0161ak rozpory existuj\u00ed, je to probl\u00e9m a Vy na tento probl\u00e9m spr\u00e1vn\u011b poukazujete.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

8. Jak\u00fd m\u00e1te n\u00e1zor na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee zfal\u0161ovan\u00e9 v\u011bty z p\u0159episu odposlech\u016f opsali do sv\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed soudci nejen Vrchn\u00edho soudu v Olomouci, ale i Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu, a to ani\u017e byly v\u016fbec odposlechy provedeny jako d\u016fkaz p\u0159i hlavn\u00edm l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Jde v podstat\u011b o prohlouben\u00ed toho probl\u00e9mu, proto\u017ee se v tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b soudci nesezn\u00e1mili s odposlechy, ale jen s jejich p\u0159episy, a to je podle m\u011b \u0161patn\u011b.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

9. A\u017e po pravomocn\u00fdch odsuzuj\u00edc\u00edch rozhodnut\u00ed krajsk\u00e9ho a vrchn\u00edho soudu vznikly nov\u00e9 znaleck\u00e9 posudky \u0159ady erudovan\u00fdch odborn\u00edk\u016f v oblasti patologie, soudn\u00edho l\u00e9ka\u0159stv\u00ed, biomechaniky, elektrotechniky, kte\u0159\u00ed nez\u00e1visle na sob\u011b z\u00e1sadn\u011b zpochyb\u0148uj\u00ed skutkov\u00fd stav, ze kter\u00e9ho soudy vych\u00e1zely a na z\u00e1klad\u011b kter\u00e9ho byl Petr Kramn\u00fd odsouzen – tedy vra\u017edu elektrick\u00fdm proudem. Mysl\u00edte si, \u017ee by m\u011bli b\u00fdt auto\u0159i t\u011bchto nov\u00fdch posudk\u016f v \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o obnov\u011b \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed soudem vyslechnuti? <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

10. M\u00e1 podle Va\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru Petr Kramn\u00fd \u0161anci s n\u00e1vrhem o obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed usp\u011bt?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

            K ot\u00e1zk\u00e1m 9 a 10. Nov\u00e9 znaleck\u00e9 posudky, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b odborn\u00e1 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed erudovan\u00fdch osob, jsou nesporn\u011b d\u016fkazy d\u0159\u00edve nezn\u00e1m\u00e9, kter\u00e9 by mohly v\u00e9st soudy k jin\u00fdm z\u00e1v\u011br\u016fm. Na druh\u00e9 stran\u011b, a v tom sm\u011bru by m\u011blo zn\u00edt j\u00e1dro obhajoby, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9 povolen\u00ed obnovy nen\u00ed je\u0161t\u011b rozhodnut\u00edm o vin\u011b, ale jen povolen\u00edm pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, kde teprve tyto nov\u00e9 d\u016fkazy budou procesn\u011b provedeny, a po jejich hodnocen\u00ed ve spojen\u00ed s hodnocen\u00edm ji\u017e d\u016fkaz\u016f proveden\u00fdch bude teprve znovu rozhodnuto.  Tak\u017ee minim\u00e1ln\u011b p\u0159i povolen\u00ed obnovy \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed by m\u011bl Petr Kramn\u00fd usp\u011bt.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

D\u011bkujeme za odpov\u011bdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V\u00e1clav Peri\u010devi\u010d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

m\u00edstop\u0159edseda Spolku \u0160alamoun<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kdo je JUDr. Pavel Ku\u010dera:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Promoval na Pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 fakult\u011b Univerzity Karlovy v roce 1967 a ve stejn\u00e9m roce nastoupil jako advok\u00e1tn\u00ed \u010dekatel do Advok\u00e1tn\u00ed poradny v Kladn\u011b. Po slo\u017een\u00ed advok\u00e1tn\u00ed zkou\u0161ky v roce 1969 p\u016fsobil v t\u00e9to poradn\u011b jako advok\u00e1t do roku 1972. V roce 1972 se stal soudcem Okresn\u00edho soudu v Kladn\u011b a od roku 1977 do roku 1990 byl soudcem Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Praze. V roce 1981 slo\u017eil doktorskou rigorozn\u00ed zkou\u0161ku. Jako soudce Okresn\u00edho soudu v Kladn\u011b i Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Praze vy\u0159izoval trestn\u00ed agendu. V roce 1990 a v prvn\u00edch m\u011bs\u00edc\u00edch roku 1991 pracoval jako z\u00e1stupce vedouc\u00edho Kancel\u00e1\u0159e prezidenta republiky. V kv\u011btnu 1991 byl zvolen Feder\u00e1ln\u00edm shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00edm soudcem Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cSFR a od 1.1.1993 byl soudcem Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cR. Jako soudce Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cSFR zast\u00e1val funkci p\u0159edsedy trestn\u00edho kolegia, jako soudce Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cR zast\u00e1val funkci m\u00edstop\u0159edsedy soudu. Od roku 1993 se pod\u00edlel na p\u0159\u00edprav\u011b nov\u00e9ho Trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kona a Trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du jako \u010dlen rekodifika\u010dn\u00ed komise. Jako p\u0159edseda redak\u010dn\u00ed rady odborn\u00e9ho \u010dasopisu Trestn\u00ed pr\u00e1vo pravideln\u011b publikuje v tomto \u010dasopise. Od roku 2004 je m\u00edstop\u0159edsedou Rady Justi\u010dn\u00ed akademie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nikdy nebyl \u010dlenem \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 politick\u00e9 strany.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

 Uzn\u00e1van\u00fd b\u00fdval\u00fd soudce a m\u00edstop\u0159edseda Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky, p\u0159edseda trestn\u00edho kolegia Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu \u010cR, poskytl Spolku \u0160alamoun rozhovor v […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":306,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,12,165,161,21,164,162],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-judr-pavel-kucera","category-kauza-kramny","category-media-a-justice","category-obnovy-rizeni","category-rozhovory","category-trestni-rizeni","category-znalecke-posudky","tag-kramny"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=305"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":308,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/305\/revisions\/308"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/306"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}