{"id":1277,"date":"2022-12-06T11:27:46","date_gmt":"2022-12-06T10:27:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.spoleksalamoun.com\/?p=1277"},"modified":"2025-03-21T09:42:26","modified_gmt":"2025-03-21T08:42:26","slug":"kauza-kramny-zprava-o-prubehu-navrhu-na-obnovu-rizeni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/2022\/12\/06\/kauza-kramny-zprava-o-prubehu-navrhu-na-obnovu-rizeni\/","title":{"rendered":"Kauza Kramn\u00fd – zpr\u00e1va o pr\u016fb\u011bhu n\u00e1vrhu na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ve dnech 29. 11 a 1. 12. 2022 u Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Ostrav\u011b prob\u011bhlo ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 zased\u00e1n\u00ed o n\u00e1vrhu na obnovu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed odsouzen\u00e9ho Petra Kramn\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00davodem je nutno konstatovat, \u017ee jak sen\u00e1t JUDr. \u0160\u00e1rky Skalsk\u00e9, tak cel\u00fd KS v Ostrav\u011b se sna\u017eil o zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed d\u016fstojnosti, zdvo\u0159ilosti, v\u010detn\u011b p\u0159\u00edstupu k ve\u0159ejnosti u hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed, velmi korektn\u00edm zp\u016fsobem, kter\u00fd je naprosto neb\u00fdval\u00fd a nepochybn\u011b zaslou\u017e\u00ed pod\u011bkov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

P\u0159\u00edpad m\u00e9dia ozna\u010duj\u00ed za nejsledovan\u011bj\u0161\u00ed proces desetilet\u00ed a tomu i odpov\u00eddala zcela zapln\u011bn\u00e1 nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed jednac\u00ed s\u00ed\u0148 KS v Ostrav\u011b \u010d. 7.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A\u010d zpr\u00e1vy ze soudn\u00edch s\u00edn\u00ed tzv. soudni\u010dky maj\u00ed velmi bohatou historii (Karel Pol\u00e1\u010dek, Jakub Arbes, Jaroslav Ha\u0161ek, Jan Drda a \u0159ada dal\u0161\u00edch), bohu\u017eel medi\u00e1ln\u00ed v\u00fdstupy z ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho zased\u00e1n\u00ed s Petrem Kramn\u00fdm sledujeme s m\u00edrn\u00fdm roz\u010darov\u00e1n\u00edm, a to z d\u016fvodu, \u017ee zpr\u00e1vy ze soudn\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b se p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b net\u00fdkaj\u00ed merita v\u011bci, ale vzez\u0159en\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho, co\u017e lze st\u011b\u017e\u00ed pova\u017eovat za profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed \u017eurnalistiku. D\u016fvody nelze postavit najisto, a tak se asi nikdy nedozv\u00edme, zda je to z d\u016fvodu neznalosti „procesu a p\u0159\u00edpadu“, \u010di z obavy, \u017ee zejm\u00e9na bulv\u00e1rn\u00ed m\u00e9dia „vra\u017ed\u00edc\u00ed zr\u016fdu elektrick\u00fdm proudem – Petra Kramn\u00e9ho“ vlastn\u00edm p\u0159i\u010din\u011bn\u00edm vytvo\u0159ila. Chceme z\u00e1sadn\u011b akcentovat, \u017ee to, jak je Petr Kramn\u00fd ost\u0159\u00edh\u00e1n, \u010di jak\u00fd m\u00e1 v\u00fdraz ve tv\u00e1\u0159i, skute\u010dn\u011b nen\u00ed meritem obnovy \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, ale \u0159ada m\u00e9di\u00ed, zejm\u00e9na bulv\u00e1rn\u00edch, t\u011bmto okolnostem v\u011bnuje mimo\u0159\u00e1dnou pozornost, nam\u00edsto zjevn\u00fdch chyb p\u0159i hodnocen\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f, kter\u00e9 jsou jim p\u0159edest\u00edr\u00e1ny p\u0159edvolan\u00fdmi znalci.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Den prvn\u00ed<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n


Dne 29. 11. 2022 byl na po\u0159adu jedn\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fdslech autor\u016f znaleck\u00fdch posudk\u016f prof. MUDr. Ivo Steinera, CSc. a doc. MUDr. Alexandra Pilina, CSc. M\u00e1lokdo v\u00ed, \u017ee jmenovan\u00ed jsou posledn\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed vid\u011bli v mikroskopu tzv. nekroptick\u00fd materi\u00e1l Moniky a Kl\u00e1ry Kramn\u00fdch. Nekroptick\u00fd materi\u00e1l (vzorky srdce a k\u016f\u017ee) hraje v p\u0159\u00edpadu Petra Kramn\u00e9ho zcela z\u00e1sadn\u00ed roli a jak vyplynulo z v\u00fdpov\u011bdi prof. Ivo Steinera, jednoho z nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00edch evropsk\u00fdch patolog\u016f se zam\u011b\u0159en\u00edm na myokard, byl Petr Kramn\u00fd odsouzen pr\u00e1v\u011b na z\u00e1klad\u011b histologick\u00fdch prepar\u00e1t\u016f. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Znalci ve shod\u011b stvrdili sv\u016fj znaleck\u00fd posudek, kter\u00fd neprokazuje a ba vylu\u010duje \u00fa\u010dinky elektrick\u00e9ho proudu na t\u011bla a org\u00e1ny Moniky a Kl\u00e1rky Kramn\u00fdch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Skoro zapadlo i sd\u011blen\u00ed prof. Ivo Steinera, \u017ee zni\u010den\u00ed jedin\u00e9ho d\u016fkazn\u00edho materi\u00e1lu, ze strany ostravsk\u00e9ho cappo di tutti capi Igora Dvo\u0159\u00e1\u010dka je faktick\u00fdm p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00edm viny (zde si m\u016f\u017eeme polo\u017eit ot\u00e1zku, pro\u010d by n\u011bkdo ni\u010dil d\u016fkaz, kter\u00fd by sv\u011bd\u010dil v jeho prosp\u011bch, jak to \u010din\u00ed pan Dvo\u0159\u00e1\u010dek).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
prof. Ivo Steiner<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

D\u00e1le jen mal\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st m\u00e9di\u00ed informovala z na\u0161eho pohledu o zcela z\u00e1sadn\u00edm momentu, a to, \u017ee p\u0159ed v\u00fdslechem znalce doc. MUDr. Alexandra Pilina, CSc. intervenuj\u00edc\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce Mgr. V\u00edt Legersk\u00fd, kter\u00fd od po\u010d\u00e1tku \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed tuto kauzu dozoroval a je jedn\u00edm z autor\u016f konstrukce o vra\u017ed\u011b elektrick\u00fdm proudem, se n\u00e1mitkou do\u017eadoval neproveden\u00ed v\u00fdslechu doc. Pilina.Argumentace st\u00e1tn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce Legersk\u00e9ho byla natolik v\u00e1gn\u00ed, nesmysln\u00e1 a zejm\u00e9na \u00fa\u010delov\u00e1, \u017ee sen\u00e1t JUDr. \u0160\u00e1rky Skalsk\u00e9 n\u00e1mitku zam\u00edtl a d\u016fkaz provedl.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A\u010dkoliv se m\u00e9di\u00edm tento moment zd\u00e1 b\u00fdt nepodstatn\u00fd, opak je pravdou. Polo\u017ete si spole\u010dn\u011b s n\u00e1mi ot\u00e1zku – je opravdu ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m z\u00e1jmu postup st\u00e1tn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce, kter\u00fd chce zabr\u00e1nit zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed objektivn\u00ed pravdy? Je to pr\u00e1v\u011b st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce, kter\u00fd reprezentuje v trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00fd z\u00e1jem, a t\u00edm je objektivn\u00ed zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, zda ke skutku do\u0161lo, a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b kdo je za tento skutek odpov\u011bdn\u00fd. Je v z\u00e1jmu spravedlnosti a v souladu s trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00e1dem br\u00e1nit proveden\u00ed d\u016fkazu? Nebo byl pan st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce veden obavou a strachem z toho, \u017ee v soudn\u00ed s\u00edni zazn\u00ed to, co doslova vylu\u010duje jeho konstrukci o vra\u017ed\u011b elektrick\u00fdm proudem?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Den druh\u00fd<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Ve \u010dtvrtek 1. 12. 2022 pokra\u010dovalo ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 zased\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159ehr\u00e1n\u00edm odposlech\u016f Petra Kramn\u00e9ho. M\u00e9dia informuj\u00ed, \u017ee za rozhovor dostal Kramn\u00fd od bulv\u00e1rn\u00edho den\u00edku \u010d\u00e1stku 30.000 K\u010d. Bohu\u017eel ji\u017e m\u00e9dia neinformuj\u00ed, \u017ee tuto \u010d\u00e1stku nevyu\u017eil pro svoji pot\u0159ebu, ale slo\u017eil j\u00ed z\u00e1lohu na v\u00fdrobu pomn\u00edku pro Moniku a Kl\u00e1ru, co\u017e se patrn\u011b nehod\u00ed do medi\u00e1ln\u00edho obrazu vraha.St\u011b\u017eejn\u00ed rozhovor s tetou V. D., kde m\u011bl Kramn\u00fd uv\u00e9st v\u011btu: „Tak mi to v\u0161echno vy\u0161lo i v tom Egypt\u011b“ m\u00e9dia ozna\u010duj\u00ed, \u017ee v rozhovoru nezazn\u011bla, \u010di, \u017ee do\u0161lo ke zkreslen\u00ed. Op\u011bt patrn\u011b z neznalosti cel\u00e9 v\u011bci m\u00e9dia netu\u0161\u00ed, \u017ee v\u011bta. „Tak mi to v\u0161echno vy\u0161lo i v tom Egypt\u011b“ je jeden z dal\u0161\u00edch pil\u00ed\u0159\u016f odsuzuj\u00edc\u00edho rozsudku. Pokud si pe\u010dliv\u011b poslechnete \u00fastn\u00ed od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed a p\u00edsemn\u00fd rozsudek nad Petrem Kramn\u00fdm ze dne 7. 1. 2016 tak zjist\u00edte, \u017ee: 
Soudkyni Gilov\u00e9 k rozhodnut\u00ed pomohly i odposlechy, v kter\u00fdch se Kramn\u00fd chlub\u00ed sv\u00e9 tet\u011b, \u017ee mu v Egypt\u011b v\u0161echno vy\u0161lo. D\u016fkaz<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a>
Kramn\u00fd – V\u0161echno mi vy\u0161lo<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Ji\u017e men\u0161\u00ed \u010d\u00e1st m\u00e9di\u00ed uv\u00e1d\u00ed, \u017ee tuto v\u011btu opisuj\u00ed Krajsk\u00fd soud v Ostrav\u011b, Vrchn\u00ed soud v Olomouci a dokonce Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud, a\u010dkoliv nikdy nezazn\u011bla. Nesouhlas\u00edme s n\u00e1zorem, \u017ee se jedn\u00e1 o drobnost, ale o zcela \u00famyslnou a \u00fa\u010delovou manipulaci s d\u016fkazy. Stav, \u017ee je do \u00fast Petra Kramn\u00e9ho vlo\u017eena v\u011bta, kterou nikdy ne\u0159ekl, a kter\u00e1 je n\u00e1sledn\u011b vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1na jako z\u00e1kladn\u00ed stavebn\u00ed k\u00e1men odsuzuj\u00edc\u00edho rozsudku, je nep\u0159ijateln\u00fdm p\u0159ekrucov\u00e1n\u00edm skute\u010dn\u00e9ho stavu v\u011bci.I v dal\u0161\u00edm odposlechu v rozhovoru s poji\u0161\u0165ovnou je zcela vyvr\u00e1cen argument odsuzuj\u00edc\u00edho rozsudku, \u017ee: „chladnokrevn\u011b volal poji\u0161\u0165ovnu s p\u0159ipraven\u00fdm \u010d\u00edslem smlouvy“.Jak vyplynulo z p\u0159ehr\u00e1n\u00ed rozhovoru, zjevn\u011b ot\u0159esen\u00fd Kramn\u00fd sice vol\u00e1 poji\u0161\u0165ovnu, ale nem\u00e1 p\u0159ipraven\u00e9 \u010d\u00edslo smlouvy a oper\u00e1torka jej nav\u00e1d\u00ed, kde \u010d\u00edslo nalezne. Je to dal\u0161\u00ed konstrukt a manipulace st\u00e1tn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce Legersk\u00e9ho, n\u00e1sledn\u011b nekriticky p\u0159ejat\u00e9ho sen\u00e1tem soudkyn\u011b Gilov\u00e9.V dal\u0161\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti jedn\u00e1n\u00ed bylo p\u0159istoupeno k v\u00fdslechu znalc\u016f tzv. mezioborov\u00e9ho posudku z odv\u011btv\u00ed forenzn\u00ed biomechaniky, soudn\u00edho l\u00e9ka\u0159stv\u00ed a elektra, kter\u00fd vypracovaly zku\u0161en\u00e9 autority, dnes ji\u017e rektor doc. Ing. Zden\u011bk Hor\u00e1k, MUDr. Zden\u011bk \u0160\u0148up\u00e1rek, a doc. Ing. Zden\u011bk Koke\u0161, CSc. (posledn\u00ed jmenovan\u00fd bohu\u017eel v mezidob\u00ed zem\u0159el).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bohu\u017eel ji\u017e \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 m\u00e9dium nep\u0159ineslo z na\u0161eho pohledu zcela z\u00e1sadn\u00ed zpr\u00e1vu o tom, \u017ee toto\u017en\u011b jako v \u00fater\u00fd se sna\u017eil intervenuj\u00edc\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce V\u00edt Legersk\u00fd zabr\u00e1nit proveden\u00ed tohoto d\u016fkazu, op\u011bt argumentac\u00ed tak v\u00e1gn\u00ed a zcela nesmyslnou, dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru i odporuj\u00edc\u00ed z\u00e1konu, \u017ee znovu sen\u00e1t JUDr. \u0160\u00e1rky Skalsk\u00e9 tuto n\u00e1mitku zam\u00edtl a d\u016fkaz provedl.
Pro pochopen\u00ed cel\u00e9ho stavu v\u011bci, st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce Legersk\u00fd samoz\u0159ejm\u011b moc dob\u0159e v\u011bd\u011bl, co znalci \u0159eknou, proto\u017ee jejich z\u00e1v\u011bry v p\u00edsemn\u00e9 podob\u011b jsou sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed spisov\u00e9ho materi\u00e1lu, a p\u0159esto (nebo pr\u00e1v\u011b proto) se proveden\u00ed tohoto d\u016fkazu sna\u017eil vehementn\u011b a opakovan\u011b zabr\u00e1nit. Znovu se pt\u00e1me, je takov\u00fd postup st\u00e1tn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce Legersk\u00e9ho ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m z\u00e1jmu, v z\u00e1jmu spravedlnosti a spravedliv\u00e9ho procesu? Proto\u017ee jeho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed sp\u00ed\u0161e vypov\u00edd\u00e1 o tom, \u017ee je veden obavou, aby pln\u00e1 soudn\u00ed s\u00ed\u0148 znovu nesly\u0161ela z \u00fast dal\u0161\u00edch naprosto nezpochybniteln\u00fdch autorit, \u017ee se \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 vra\u017eda el. proudem na pokoji \u010d. 6343 nestala a st\u00e1t nemohla, proto\u017ee k tomu nen\u00ed naprosto \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd d\u016fkaz, a konstrukce ob\u017ealoby by se tak definitivn\u011b zcela zhroutila.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
doc. MUDr. Alexander Pilin<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Znalci Matlach – Farga\u0161<\/h2>\n\n\n\n


<\/strong>Doslova pupe\u010dn\u00ed \u0161\u0148\u016frou jsou s kauzou Kramn\u00fd spojeni odsouzen\u00ed znalci MUDr. Radek Matlach a MUDr. Igor Farga\u0161. Z toho, co zazn\u011blo v soudn\u00ed s\u00edni ve dnech 29. 11. a 1. 12. 2022 jsou jednozna\u010dn\u011b d\u00e1ny d\u016fvody obnovy \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed v jejich kauze. M\u00e1lokdo m\u00e1 tu\u0161en\u00ed, \u017ee meritem st\u00edh\u00e1n\u00ed znalc\u016f Matlach – Farga\u0161 nebylo \u00fadajn\u00e9 vypracov\u00e1n\u00ed nepravdiv\u00e9ho znaleck\u00e9ho posudku cca 1 a p\u016fl roku od jeho vyhotoven\u00ed, ale snaha zastra\u0161it kriminalizac\u00ed nov\u00e9 znalce obhajoby, kte\u0159\u00ed se v\u0161ak nezalekli a posudky dle sv\u00e9ho nejlep\u0161\u00ed odborn\u00e9ho v\u011bdom\u00ed a lidsk\u00e9ho sv\u011bdom\u00ed zpracovali, a popsali, co se v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b Petra Kramn\u00e9ho odehr\u00e1lo za manipulace se skutkov\u00fdm stavem. Nast\u00e1v\u00e1 naprosto bezprecedentn\u00ed stav, kdy znalci Matlach – Farga\u0161 byli odsouzeni p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm za to, \u017ee vyslovili hypot\u00e9zu, \u017ee Monika a Kl\u00e1ra Kramn\u00fdch mohly zem\u0159\u00edt i z jin\u00e9ho d\u016fvodu, ne\u017e je vra\u017eda elektrick\u00fdm proudem (pro pln\u00e9 pochopen\u00ed znalci ve dnech 29. 11. a 1. 12. 2022 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 hypot\u00e9zy nevyslovovali, ale kategoricky vylou\u010dili z\u00e1v\u011bry o vra\u017ed\u011b elektrick\u00fdm proudem).
Z\u00e1kladn\u00edm argumentem odsouzen\u00ed znalc\u016f Matlacha a Farga\u0161e bylo \u00fadajn\u00e9 chybn\u00e9 vyhodnocen\u00ed histologick\u00e9ho prepar\u00e1tu \u010d. 21 (st\u0159eva Moniky Kramn\u00e9), kde vid\u011bli tzv. z\u00e1n\u011btliv\u00e9 polynukle\u00e1ry. Nikoho jist\u011b nep\u0159ekvap\u00ed, \u017ee u Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b vy\u0161lo najevo, \u017ee ve spisov\u00e9m materi\u00e1lu je zalo\u017een zcela jin\u00fd histologick\u00fd prepar\u00e1t \u010d. 21, ne\u017e vid\u011bli znalci Matlach – Farga\u0161. A\u010d je to b\u011b\u017en\u011b op\u011bt nemo\u017en\u00e9, existuj\u00ed dva zcela rozd\u00edln\u00e9 prepar\u00e1ty s toto\u017en\u00fdm \u010d\u00edslem 21, co\u017e jinak \u0159e\u010deno znamen\u00e1, \u017ee p\u016fvodn\u00ed prepar\u00e1t s \u010d. 21 n\u011bkdo vym\u011bnil za nov\u00fd prepar\u00e1t \u010d. 21. Jedn\u00e1 se o dal\u0161\u00ed t\u011b\u017eko uv\u011b\u0159itelnou manipulaci s d\u016fkazn\u00edm materi\u00e1lem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

St\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce V\u00edt Legersk\u00fd<\/h2>\n\n\n\n


<\/strong>V z\u00e1v\u011bru jedn\u00e1n\u00ed m\u00e9dia v\u016fbec nezaznamenala, \u017ee z\u00e1stupci Spolku \u0160alamoun po skon\u010den\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho zased\u00e1n\u00ed a ve sv\u011btle informac\u00ed, kter\u00e9 sly\u0161el zejm\u00e9na soud a ve\u0159ejnost v jednac\u00ed s\u00edni, vyzvali V\u00edta Legersk\u00e9ho k zah\u00e1jen\u00ed \u00fakon\u016f trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed z principu oficiality, a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b k okam\u017eit\u00e9 rezignaci. A\u010d z\u00e1stupce ve\u0159ejnosti, placen z pen\u011bz da\u0148ov\u00fdch poplatn\u00edk\u016f, v rozporu se z\u00e1k.\u010d. 283\/1993 Sb., kdy je povinen se vyst\u0159\u00edhat v\u0161eho, co by mohlo vzbuzovat pochybnosti o nez\u00e1vislosti v\u00fdkonu jeho funkce, doslova jako spr\u00e1skan\u00fd pes utekl ze soudn\u00ed budovy, zjevn\u011b rozru\u0161en z toho, co v soudn\u00ed s\u00edn\u00ed sly\u0161el. (Sic!) Je samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nab\u00edledni a zcela p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00e9, \u017ee se bude sna\u017eit znalce obhajoby, respektovan\u00e9 bardy z \u0159ady znaleck\u00fdch odv\u011btv\u00ed, kriminalizovat. S odstupem \u010dasu m\u016f\u017eeme dnes prozradit, \u017ee zejm\u00e9na v po\u010d\u00e1tku v\u0161echny odborn\u00e9 z\u00e1v\u011bry a znaleck\u00e9 posudky, zejm\u00e9na z odv\u011btv\u00ed soudn\u00edho l\u00e9ka\u0159stv\u00ed Spolek \u0160alamoun konzultoval i s odborn\u00edky mimo \u00fazem\u00ed \u010cR, kte\u0159\u00ed nebyli pod t\u011b\u017eko uv\u011b\u0159iteln\u00fdm medi\u00e1ln\u00edm lyn\u010dem. Pr\u00e1v\u011b z tohoto d\u016fvodu ji\u017e \u0159adu let pl\u00e9dujeme, \u017ee se ji\u017e na \u00fazem\u00ed nejen \u010cR, ale i Evropy nenajde znalec \u010di \u00fastav, kter\u00fd by se podepsal pod z\u00e1v\u011br o vra\u017ed\u011b elektrick\u00fdm proudem. Nadto pouk\u00e1\u017eeme na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee doktor Vorel a jeho znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav (auto\u0159i revizn\u00edho znaleck\u00e9ho posudku)  rad\u011bji v mezidob\u00ed ukon\u010dili znaleckou \u010dinnost.Z t\u011bchto d\u016fvod\u016f z\u00e1stupci Spolku \u0160alamoun vyzvali st\u00e1tn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce, aby konal nebo, aby okam\u017eit\u011b rezignoval, nebo\u0165 jeho postup v r\u00e1mci tohoto \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed je ve zjevn\u00e9m rozporu s jeho povinnostmi a \u00fa\u010delem \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed jako takov\u00e9ho, tedy zjistit skutkov\u00fd stav co nejp\u0159esn\u011bji a p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b dohledat osoby, kter\u00e9 jsou za n\u011bj odpov\u011bdn\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Z\u00e1v\u011br<\/h2>\n\n\n\n


<\/strong>Nerozum\u00edme a nech\u00e1peme stav, s ohledem na to, co zazn\u011blo v soudn\u00ed s\u00edni ve shora uveden\u00fdch dnech, \u017ee dosud v r\u00e1mci \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nikdo nevyslovil star\u00e9 r\u010den\u00ed „c\u00edsa\u0159 nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 \u0161aty“ \u010di alespo\u0148 „Legersk\u00fd nem\u00e1 d\u016fkazy“, a \u017ee v n\u00e1vaznosti na nadepsan\u00e9 nedostatky v teorii p\u0159ednesen\u00e9 v ob\u017ealob\u011b nebylo p\u0159istoupeno k p\u0159eru\u0161en\u00ed v\u00fdkonu trestu, jak to soudu umo\u017e\u0148uje \u00a7 282 odst. 3 Trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du. P\u0159edm\u011bt jedn\u00e1n\u00ed je vymeziteln\u00fd pom\u011brn\u011b jednodu\u0161e – existuj\u00ed d\u016fvody pochybovat, \u017ee p\u016fvodn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed soudu je mo\u017eno u\u010dinit i ve sv\u011btle nov\u00fdch d\u016fkaz\u016f? Odpov\u011b\u010f je prost\u00e1, nem\u016f\u017ee. P\u0159edn\u011b padla p\u016fvodn\u00ed teorie bulv\u00e1rn\u00edch m\u00e9di\u00ed o „dozn\u00e1n\u00ed“ Petra Kramn\u00e9ho v r\u00e1mci odposlech\u016f, \u017ee „mu to v\u0161echno vy\u0161lo, i v tom Egypt\u011b“, jak zazn\u011blo, nebo sp\u00ed\u0161e nezazn\u011blo v r\u00e1mci p\u0159ehr\u00e1n\u00ed odposlech\u016f. Jako pov\u011bstn\u00fd posledn\u00ed h\u0159eb\u00edk do rakve ob\u017ealoby p\u016fsob\u00ed v\u00fdpov\u011bdi znalc\u016f, kter\u00e9 lze stru\u010dn\u011b shrnout tak, \u017ee d\u011bj popsan\u00fd v ob\u017ealob\u011b je prakticky neprovediteln\u00fd, a pokud se tak skute\u010dn\u011b m\u011blo st\u00e1t, nepochybn\u011b by zanechal na prvn\u00ed pohled patrn\u00e9 stopy, kter\u00e9 v\u0161ak nikdo nep\u0159edlo\u017eil.Zva\u017ete si sami, jak by se V\u00e1m l\u00edbilo, kdybyste byli odsouzeni za \u0161patn\u00fd \u00fa\u010des, pohled \u010di dojem, jak\u00fd jste zanechali p\u0159i jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, a bez jedin\u00e9ho hmatateln\u00e9ho d\u016fkazu Va\u0161\u00ed viny. Trestn\u00ed justice m\u00e1 jako z\u00e1klad pou\u017e\u00edvat p\u0159ezkoumateln\u00e9 d\u016fkazy, nikoli tyto dojmy, a kone\u010dn\u00e9 rozhodnut\u00ed m\u00e1 b\u00fdt v\u00fdsledkem hodnocen\u00ed p\u0159edlo\u017een\u00fdch z\u00e1znam\u016f, sv\u011bdectv\u00ed, listin a znaleck\u00fdch z\u00e1v\u011br\u016f, a nikoliv pocit\u016f \u010di domn\u011bnek.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spolek \u0160alamoun
<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n


John Bok, \u010destn\u00fd p\u0159edseda

za v\u00fdbor Spolku \u0160alamoun:
<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

V\u00e1clav Peri\u010devi\u010d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav \u0160padrna, Ph.D.
Mgr. \u0160imon Mach<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ve dnech 29. 11 a 1. 12. 2022 u Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Ostrav\u011b prob\u011bhlo ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 zased\u00e1n\u00ed o n\u00e1vrhu na obnovu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2535,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,12,165,161,164,162],"tags":[20,57],"class_list":["post-1277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archiv","category-kauza-kramny","category-media-a-justice","category-obnovy-rizeni","category-trestni-rizeni","category-znalecke-posudky","tag-kramny","tag-legersky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1277"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2702,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1277\/revisions\/2702"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2535"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}