{"id":1177,"date":"2022-08-30T10:08:01","date_gmt":"2022-08-30T08:08:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.spoleksalamoun.com\/?p=1177"},"modified":"2025-03-21T09:13:57","modified_gmt":"2025-03-21T08:13:57","slug":"soudce-ales-novotny-kladne-hodnoceny-soudce-nebo-ostuda-ceske-justice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/2022\/08\/30\/soudce-ales-novotny-kladne-hodnoceny-soudce-nebo-ostuda-ceske-justice\/","title":{"rendered":"Soudce Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd – „kladn\u011b“ hodnocen\u00fd soudce nebo ostuda \u010desk\u00e9 justice?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Velk\u00fd rozruch, a to na pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed, vzbudilo rozhodnut\u00ed ministra spravedlnosti JUDr. Pavla Bla\u017eka nejmenovat nov\u00fdm m\u00edstop\u0159edsedou pro trestn\u00ed \u00fasek Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Brn\u011b soudce Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho.  Jedn\u00edm z argument\u016f ministra Bla\u017eka byla skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u0159ada rozhodnut\u00ed sen\u00e1tu 46 T, jeho\u017e p\u0159edsedou je navrhovan\u00fd m\u00edstop\u0159edseda soudu Mgr. Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd, byla vy\u0161\u0161\u00edmi soudy zru\u0161ena jako nez\u00e1konn\u00e1 a proto musel st\u00e1t, za kter\u00fd jedn\u00e1 Ministerstvo spravedlnosti, za jeho nez\u00e1konn\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed vyplatit po\u0161kozen\u00fdm osob\u00e1m od\u0161kodn\u011bn\u00ed ze \u017ealovan\u00fdch cca 468 milion\u016f korun, prozat\u00edm ve v\u00fd\u0161i p\u0159ibli\u017en\u011b 4 milion\u016f korun. A nejedn\u00e1 se o \u010d\u00e1stku kone\u010dnou, nebo\u0165 n\u011bkter\u00e1 od\u0161kod\u0148ovac\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed podle z\u00e1kona \u010d. 82\/1998 Sb. je\u0161t\u011b d\u00e1le prob\u00edhaj\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Soudce Novotn\u00fd<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V roce 2020 tak\u00e9 ud\u011blil tehdej\u0161\u00ed p\u0159edseda Krajsk\u00e9ho soudu v Brn\u011b JUDr. Milan Bo\u0159ek soudci Novotn\u00e9mu v\u00fdtku za to, \u017ee nebyl schopen ani za 19 m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f p\u00edsemn\u011b vyhotovit rozsudek a mnohokr\u00e1t, opakovan\u011b \u017e\u00e1dal o prodlou\u017een\u00ed lh\u016fty k jeho p\u00edsemn\u00e9mu vyhotoven\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Vyrojila se \u0159ada p\u0159ekvapiv\u00fdch reakc\u00ed n\u00e1tlakov\u00fdch skupin, a to i profesn\u00edch, jako je nap\u0159. Soudcovsk\u00e1 unie nebo Unie st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f,<\/strong> kter\u00e1 argumentovala t\u00edm, \u017ee se \u00fadajn\u011b jedn\u00e1 o z\u00e1sah do nez\u00e1vislosti justice, \u017ee proti soudci Novotn\u00e9mu pro jeho nez\u00e1konn\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed nebyla vedena k\u00e1rn\u00e1 \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, a \u017ee v\u0161echna ministrem zmi\u0148ovan\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed byla u\u010din\u011bna sen\u00e1tem a hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed sen\u00e1tu je tajn\u00e9. Ministr proto p\u0159ece nem\u016f\u017ee v\u011bd\u011bt, jak doty\u010dn\u00fd soudce hlasoval. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Teprve v reakci na zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed informace o ud\u011blen\u00ed v\u00fdtky soudci Ale\u0161i Novotn\u00e9mu v roce 2020 za\u010dal prezident Soudcovsk\u00e9 unie v\u00e1hav\u011b m\u00edrnit svoje p\u0159edchoz\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed. Pr\u00fd kdyby to Soudcovsk\u00e1 unie v\u011bd\u011bla d\u0159\u00edv, pak by \u00fadajn\u011b ministra za jeho rozhodnut\u00ed nekritizovala.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Potom je ov\u0161em ot\u00e1zkou, pro\u010d se Soudcovsk\u00e1 unie vm\u011b\u0161uje do rozhodnut\u00ed ministra spravedlnosti a kritizuje ho za rozhodnut\u00ed, jeho\u017e p\u0159esn\u00e9 d\u016fvody nezn\u00e1.<\/strong> Pr\u00e1vo b\u00fdt jmenov\u00e1n soudn\u00edm funkcion\u00e1\u0159em (tedy p\u0159edsedou nebo m\u00edstop\u0159edsedou soudu) nen\u00ed z\u00e1kladn\u00edm lidsk\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem, ba nen\u00ed na n\u011bj podle z\u00e1kona v\u016fbec pr\u00e1vn\u00ed n\u00e1rok. Podle \u0159ady rozhodnut\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu se soudn\u00ed moc tradi\u010dn\u011b d\u011bl\u00ed na slo\u017eku jurisdik\u010dn\u00ed (kter\u00e1 zahrnuje rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed soudc\u016f) a slo\u017eku spr\u00e1vn\u00ed (kter\u00e1 zaji\u0161\u0165uje spr\u00e1vu a chod justice). Rozhodnut\u00ed o nejmenov\u00e1n\u00ed navr\u017een\u00e9ho soudce na funkci m\u00edstop\u0159edsedy soudu proto z podstaty v\u011bci nijak neohro\u017euje nez\u00e1vislost justice a do jej\u00ed nez\u00e1vislosti nijak nezasahuje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Soudce Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naopak, do nez\u00e1vislosti justice mnohem v\u00edce zasahuj\u00ed tito hlasit\u00ed k\u0159iklouni ze Soudcovsk\u00e9 unie a Unie st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A mimochodem, pro\u010d se ke hlasit\u00e9mu k\u0159iku p\u0159ipojila tak\u00e9 Unie st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f? Jako by nesta\u010dila jin\u00e1 jej\u00ed d\u0159\u00edv\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e1 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed, kter\u00e1 jsou na pov\u00e1\u017eenou. Vad\u00ed snad Unii st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f, \u017ee byl ministrem kritizov\u00e1n pr\u00e1v\u011b soudce Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd, kter\u00fd opakovan\u011b nadr\u017eoval ob\u017ealob\u011b a nerespektoval n\u00e1lezy \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu, podle kter\u00fdch trestn\u00ed soudy nesm\u011bj\u00ed b\u00fdt pomocn\u00edkem org\u00e1n\u016f ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 \u017ealoby a jsou povinny v\u011bci projedn\u00e1vat a rozhodovat zcela nestrann\u011b?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Pokud za nez\u00e1konn\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed nebylo proti soudci Ale\u0161i Novotn\u00e9mu dosud vedeno \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 k\u00e1rn\u00e9 \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, pak jenom proto, \u017ee nikdo z p\u0159edch\u016fdc\u016f \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd takov\u00fd n\u00e1vrh na jeho zah\u00e1jen\u00ed nepodal a v sou\u010dasn\u00e9 dob\u011b je jeho k\u00e1rn\u00e1 odpov\u011bdnost ji\u017e proml\u010dena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A pokud jde o pen\u00edze vyplacen\u00e9 st\u00e1tem po\u0161kozen\u00fdm \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk\u016fm trestn\u00edch \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed za nez\u00e1konn\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed vydan\u00e1 sen\u00e1tem 46 T pod veden\u00edm soudce Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho, pak tyto pen\u00edze jdou z pen\u011bz da\u0148ov\u00fdch poplatn\u00edk\u016f, tedy v\u0161ech (v\u00fdd\u011ble\u010dn\u011b \u010dinn\u00fdch) ob\u010dan\u016f tohoto st\u00e1tu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

St\u00e1t m\u00e1 sice podle z\u00e1kona \u010d. 82\/1998 Sb. mo\u017enost vym\u00e1hat \u0161kodu po \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edch osob\u00e1ch, kter\u00e9 \u0161kodu zp\u016fsobily, to v\u0161ak jenom do v\u00fd\u0161e \u010dty\u0159ap\u016fln\u00e1sobku m\u011bs\u00ed\u010dn\u00edho platu, a v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b soudc\u016f a st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f jedin\u011b za podm\u00ednky, \u017ee bylo o jejich vin\u011b pravomocn\u011b rozhodnuto v k\u00e1rn\u00e9m \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Takov\u00e1 podm\u00ednka je v praxi nesplniteln\u00e1, proto\u017ee k\u00e1rn\u00e9 n\u00e1vrhy proti soudc\u016fm nebo st\u00e1tn\u00edm z\u00e1stupc\u016fm za jejich nez\u00e1konn\u00fd postup pod\u00e1v\u00e1ny nejsou, a pokud u\u017e se tak zcela v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u011b stalo (u dvou st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupky\u0148 v kauze „Postoloprty“), mezit\u00edm se k\u00e1rn\u00e1 odpov\u011bdnost proml\u010dela (viz rozhodnut\u00ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho spr\u00e1vn\u00edho soudu v k\u00e1rn\u00e9 v\u011bci sp. zn. 12 Ksz 7\/2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ostatn\u011b t\u00e9to mo\u017enosti dom\u00e1hat se regresn\u00ed n\u00e1hrady st\u00e1t v\u016fbec nevyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 a doslova tak pl\u00fdtv\u00e1 pen\u011bzi z ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho rozpo\u010dtu, tedy pen\u011bzi od da\u0148ov\u00fdch poplatn\u00edk\u016f.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A tak\u00e9 tvrzen\u00ed, \u017ee nikdo nem\u016f\u017ee v\u011bd\u011bt jak kter\u00fd \u010dlen sen\u00e1tu pod veden\u00edm Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho hlasuje, p\u0159edstavuje pouh\u00e9 zd\u00e1n\u00ed a iluzi pro laickou ve\u0159ejnost. P\u0159\u00edsed\u00edc\u00edmi soudci v sen\u00e1tn\u00edch v\u011bcech jsou toti\u017e osoby z jin\u00fdch profes\u00ed \u010di d\u016fchodci, tedy nikdy ne soudci z povol\u00e1n\u00ed. Tomu tak\u00e9 odpov\u00edd\u00e1 \u00farove\u0148 jejich pr\u00e1vn\u00edho v\u011bdom\u00ed (\u010di sp\u00ed\u0161e bezv\u011bdom\u00ed), kdy obvykle jsou pasivn\u011b p\u0159\u00edtomni za soudcovskou katedrou v jednac\u00ed s\u00edni, jenom „do po\u010dtu“, ale jinak p\u0159i jedn\u00e1n\u00ed neprojevuj\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dnou aktivitu, ba obvykle ani nep\u0159edst\u00edraj\u00ed opravdov\u00fd z\u00e1jem o projedn\u00e1vanou v\u011bc. Nen\u00ed neobvykl\u00e9, \u017ee p\u0159i jedn\u00e1n\u00ed v jednac\u00ed s\u00edni sp\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jak vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f na\u0161eho b\u00fdval\u00e9ho kolegy a \u010dlena, kter\u00fd monitoroval r\u016fzn\u00e1 mimob\u011b\u017en\u00e1 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed sen\u00e1tu 46 T, za posledn\u00edch sedm let (!!) \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 z p\u0159\u00edsed\u00edc\u00edch nikdy nikomu z vysl\u00fdchan\u00fdch osob p\u0159i jedn\u00e1n\u00ed nepolo\u017eila \u017e\u00e1dnou ot\u00e1zku. Byl to naopak p\u0159edseda sen\u00e1tu Mgr. Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd, kter\u00fd sv\u00e9 rozsudky, zejm\u00e9na p\u0159i jejich \u00fastn\u00edm od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00ed, velmi agresivn\u011b a \u010dasto za hranic\u00ed soudcovsk\u00e9 etiky obhajoval tak, \u017ee je vylou\u010deno, \u017ee by snad byl sv\u00fdmi p\u0159\u00edsed\u00edc\u00edmi – d\u00e1mami v pokro\u010dil\u00e9m d\u016fchodov\u00e9m v\u011bku p\u0159ehlasov\u00e1n. Podobn\u00e1 prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed n\u00e1tlakov\u00fdch skupin jsou zcela odtr\u017eena od skute\u010dn\u00e9 reality a od osobn\u00ed znalosti pr\u00e1ce sen\u00e1tu 46 T, a jsou jednou z uk\u00e1zek dysfunkce \u010desk\u00e9 justice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Spolek \u0160alamoun monitoroval \u010dty\u0159i r\u016f<\/strong>zn\u00e9 mimob\u011b\u017en\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpady, kter\u00e9 rozhodoval sen\u00e1t 46 T pod veden\u00edm p\u0159edsedy Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho. M\u00e1me d\u016fvodnou obavu, \u017ee tyto \u010dty\u0159i monitorovan\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpady jsou jenom \u0161pi\u010dkou ledovce. Proto pochybujeme, \u017ee se jedn\u00e1 o n\u00e1hodu – ve skute\u010dnosti se toti\u017e m\u016f\u017ee jednat nejenom o jednotky, ale sp\u00ed\u0161e o des\u00edtky podobn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f nebo je\u0161t\u011b v\u00edce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V r\u00e1mci objektivity a ov\u011b\u0159itelnosti si dovolujeme na n\u011bkolika konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch p\u0159\u00edpadech p\u0159ibl\u00ed\u017eit rozhodovac\u00ed \u010dinnost a kvalitu pr\u00e1ce sen\u00e1tu 46 T pod veden\u00edm jeho p\u0159edsedy Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

P\u0159\u00edpad prvn\u00ed <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ing. Alena Vit\u00e1skov\u00e1 a Michaela Schneiderov\u00e1<\/strong> M\u00e9dii \u010dasto zmi\u0148ovan\u00fdm je p\u0159\u00edpad A. Vit\u00e1skov\u00e9, kter\u00e1 byla pr\u00e1v\u011b sen\u00e1tem 46 T Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho odsouzena k 8,5 rok\u016fm odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody nepodm\u00edn\u011bn\u011b. V toto\u017en\u00e9 v\u011bci byla nap\u0159ed pravomocn\u011b odsouzena i Michaela Schneiderov\u00e1, kter\u00e1 dokonce str\u00e1vila v\u00edce jak 7 m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f ve v\u00fdkonu trestu. Teprve n\u00e1sledn\u011b byly ob\u011b d\u00e1my v pln\u00e9m rozsahu zpro\u0161t\u011bny ob\u017ealoby. Osobn\u00ed \u00fajma, kter\u00e1 vznikla zejm\u00e9na pr\u00e1v\u011b M. Schneiderov\u00e9, kter\u00e1 jako nevinn\u00e1 byla v\u011bzn\u011bna 7 m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f ve v\u00fdkonu trestu a kter\u00e1 m\u011bla z\u00e1sadn\u00ed vliv na jej\u00ed osobnostn\u00ed integritu, je prakticky finan\u010dn\u011b nevy\u010d\u00edsliteln\u00e1. A to v\u010detn\u011b mnohalet\u00e9ho mu\u010den\u00ed dal\u0161\u00ed „sprost\u00e9 obvin\u011bn\u00e9“ Aleny Vit\u00e1skov\u00e9, i kdy\u017e ta m\u011bla to „\u0161t\u011bst\u00ed v ne\u0161t\u011bst\u00ed“, \u017ee j\u00ed v\u00fdkon nez\u00e1konn\u00e9ho trestu odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody t\u011bsn\u011b minul. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

P\u0159\u00edpad druh\u00fd – Jan Eli\u00e1\u0161<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Na z\u00e1klad\u011b rozsudku sen\u00e1tu 46 T rovn\u011b\u017e za \u00fa\u010dasti soudce Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho, byl J. E. po \u0161esti letech od \u010dinu odsouzen k 13 let\u016fm za \u00fadajnou vra\u017edu. Se znalost\u00ed cel\u00e9 v\u011bci, spisov\u00e9ho materi\u00e1lu a osobn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dasti p\u0159i soudn\u00edm jedn\u00e1n\u00ed je nepochybn\u00e9, \u017ee konstrukt sen\u00e1tu 46 T je hodn\u00fd procesu z 50. let, av\u0161ak v demokratick\u00e9m pr\u00e1vn\u00edm st\u00e1t\u011b, za kter\u00fd se \u010cesk\u00e1 republika prohla\u0161uje v \u010dl\u00e1nku 1 \u00dastavy, nelze ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho J. E. pova\u017eovat za jak\u00e9hosi za „t\u0159\u00eddn\u00edho nep\u0159\u00edtele“ a zach\u00e1zet s n\u00edm z pozice presumpce viny. I p\u0159es tyto fat\u00e1ln\u00ed vady cel\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed str\u00e1vil J. E. ve vazb\u011b a v\u00fdkonu trestu v\u00edce ne\u017e 3,5 roku, ne\u017e teprve po z\u00e1sahu \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu a n\u00e1sledn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed byly rozsudky nad J. E. v\u0161echny zru\u0161eny, jeho trestn\u00ed st\u00edh\u00e1n\u00ed bylo zastaveno a ten byl propu\u0161t\u011bn na svobodu. T\u0159i a p\u016fl roku \u017eivota str\u00e1ven\u00e9ho ve v\u011bznici mu v\u0161ak nikdo nevr\u00e1t\u00ed. A skute\u010dnost, \u017ee pachatel tohoto ohavn\u00e9ho trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu st\u00e1le b\u011bh\u00e1 na svobod\u011b, nikoho nezaj\u00edm\u00e1. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

P\u0159\u00edpad t\u0159et\u00ed <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Martin Nov\u00e1k.<\/strong> V roce 2013 odsoudil sen\u00e1t 46 T za p\u0159edsednictv\u00ed Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho k 15,5 rok\u016fm odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody M. N. za pokus o vra\u017edu (kter\u00fd m\u011bl sp\u00e1chat vybdr\u017e\u010fov\u00e1n\u00edm jin\u00e9ho vozidla). N\u00e1sledn\u011b Vrchn\u00ed soud v Olomouci, a to i na z\u00e1klad\u011b n\u00e1vrhu intervenuj\u00edc\u00edho st\u00e1tn\u00edho z\u00e1stupce, p\u0159ekvalifikoval trestn\u00fd \u010din a sn\u00ed\u017eil trest o t\u011b\u017eko uv\u011b\u0159iteln\u00fdch 9 let. I p\u0159es tuto skute\u010dnost ob\u017ealovan\u00fd M. N. tento stav neust\u00e1l, nesm\u00ed\u0159il se s t\u00edmto nespravedliv\u00fdm a nez\u00e1konn\u00fdm rozsudkem a p\u0159ed rozhodnut\u00edm o mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9m opravn\u00e9m prost\u0159edku u Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho soudu a s bl\u00ed\u017e\u00edc\u00edm se n\u00e1stupem v\u00fdkonu trestu, zem\u0159el na vy\u010derp\u00e1n\u00ed organismu (\u010di \u0159\u00edzenou sebevra\u017edu). Dodnes jsou ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m prostoru elektronick\u00e9 stopy, kter\u00e9 poukazuj\u00ed na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee se s\u00e1m od sebe neupil, ale odrovnal jej soudce, kter\u00fdm nebyl nikdo jin\u00fd Mgr. Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd. Rodi\u010de M. N. podali na soudce Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho trestn\u00ed ozn\u00e1men\u00ed, proto\u017ee dle jejich n\u00e1zoru ulo\u017eil nesmysln\u011b a nez\u00e1konn\u011b vysok\u00fd trest a t\u00edm jejich syna dohnal k sebevra\u017ed\u011b. Podn\u011bt samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nebyl \u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00fd a soudce Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd je za smrt mlad\u00e9ho \u010dlov\u011bka nad\u00e1le neodpov\u011bdn\u00fd.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

P\u0159\u00edpad \u010dtvrt\u00fd – <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

„p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh policisty“<\/strong> Dne 23. 12. 2021 Spolek \u0160alamoun publikoval „p\u0159\u00edb\u011bh policisty<\/a>„. I s naprost\u00fdm respektem k ochran\u011b pr\u00e1v po\u0161kozen\u00e9 m\u016f\u017eeme s l\u00edtost\u00ed jen konstatovat, \u017ee i tento p\u0159\u00edpad (op\u011bt podivn\u011b a nelogicky) posuzoval sen\u00e1t 46 T jemu\u017e p\u0159edsedal Mgr. Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd. V medi\u00e1ln\u00edm v\u00fdstupu p\u0159edsedy sen\u00e1tu Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho je elektronicky zaznamen\u00e1no jeho vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee (\u00fadajn\u011b) „nahr\u00e1vka byla kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdm d\u016fkazem a je tam jednozna\u010dn\u011b vid\u011bt jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho“. Ji\u017e dnes m\u016f\u017eeme prozradit, \u017ee sen\u00e1t sp\u00edc\u00edch p\u0159\u00edsed\u00edc\u00edch sen\u00e1tu 46 T pod veden\u00edm Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho znovu pochybil, proto\u017ee podle znaleck\u00e9ho posudku z odv\u011btv\u00ed forenzn\u00ed biomechaniky, jsou laick\u00e9 z\u00e1v\u011bry p\u0159edsedy sen\u00e1tu Mgr. Ale\u0161e Novotn\u00e9ho zkreslen\u00e9 a nepravdiv\u00e9. Brzy toti\u017e p\u0159edlo\u017e\u00edme ve\u0159ejnosti d\u016fkazy o tom, \u017ee kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fd d\u016fkaz byl hrub\u011b zmanipulov\u00e1n a \u017ee soudce Mgr. Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd znovu selhal.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Proto pova\u017eujeme rozhodnut\u00ed ministra spravedlnosti JUDr. Pavla Bla\u017eka za naprosto legitimn\u00ed a spr\u00e1vn\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Podle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru i p\u0159i dysfunk\u010dn\u00edch kontroln\u00edch mechanismech \u010desk\u00e9 justice, kter\u00e9 ve skute\u010dnosti re\u00e1ln\u011b v\u016fbec nefunguj\u00ed, by toti\u017e Mgr. Ale\u0161 Novotn\u00fd na z\u00e1klad\u011b jeho ot\u0159esn\u00e9 rozhodovac\u00ed \u010dinnosti v\u016fbec nem\u011bl p\u016fsobit ani jako soudce (nato\u017e jako m\u00edstop\u0159edseda soudu).<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jenom na n\u00e1mi \u010dty\u0159ech monitorovan\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech tento soudce odsoudil k drakonick\u00fdm trest\u016fm t\u0159i nevinn\u00e9 osoby a m\u00e1 na rukou krev<\/strong> mlad\u00e9ho mu\u017ee, kter\u00fd se nesm\u00ed\u0159il s jeho krut\u00fdm a exhibicionistick\u00fdm rozsudkem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bohu\u017eel i to je re\u00e1ln\u00fd obraz o stavu (\u010di sp\u00ed\u0161e dysfunkci) sou\u010dasn\u00e9 \u010desk\u00e9 justice. Typick\u00fdm znakem je pak neodpov\u011bdnost konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch soudc\u016f a st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f, kter\u00e1 je motivuje k tomu, aby nad d\u016fsledky sv\u00fdch nez\u00e1konn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed v\u016fbec nep\u0159em\u00fd\u0161leli a „radostn\u011b“ doufali v kari\u00e9rn\u00ed postup.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

za Spolek \u0160alamoun:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

John Bok, \u010desn\u00fd p\u0159edseda<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

V\u00e1clav Peri\u010devi\u010d, p\u0159edseda<\/p>\n\n\n\n

JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav \u0160padrna, Ph.D., m\u00edstop\u0159edseda<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mgr. \u0160imon Mach, m\u00edstop\u0159edseda<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Velk\u00fd rozruch, a to na pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed, vzbudilo rozhodnut\u00ed ministra spravedlnosti JUDr. Pavla Bla\u017eka nejmenovat nov\u00fdm m\u00edstop\u0159edsedou pro trestn\u00ed \u00fasek Krajsk\u00e9ho […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1183,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,165,14,164,162],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-aktualni-kauzy","category-media-a-justice","category-pachove-stopy","category-trestni-rizeni","category-znalecke-posudky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1177"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1177"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2679,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1177\/revisions\/2679"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}