![\"\"](\"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/dvoracek.jpg\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n 1<\/strong>. Rozhovor P. Kramn\u00e9ho s jeho tetou V.D., kde m\u011bl uv\u00e9st „\u017ee mu to v\u0161echno vy\u0161lo, i v tom Egypt\u011b<\/strong><\/em>„. Na z\u00e1klad\u011b anal\u00fdzy spolku \u0160alamoun bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee P. Kramn\u00fd tuto v\u011btu nikdy ne\u0159ekl a p\u0159episuj\u00edc\u00ed policista kpt. Kubiena si ji oproti zvukov\u00e9mu odposlechu krystalicky vymyslel<\/span><\/strong>.(Zdroj<\/a>) <\/p>\n\n\n\n 2<\/strong>. Zcela z\u00e1sadn\u00edm d\u016fkazem byl posudek znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., v \u010dele s tehdej\u0161\u00edm p\u0159ednostou a znalcem v odv\u011btv\u00ed soudn\u00edho l\u00e9ka\u0159stv\u00ed Franti\u0161kem Vorlem, kter\u00fd v tzv. revizn\u00edm znaleck\u00e9m posudku potvrdil vra\u017edu elektrick\u00fdm proudem. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Na z\u00e1klad\u011b t\u011bchto dvou d\u016fkaz\u016f byl P. Kramn\u00fd odsouzen k v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u00e9mu trestu 28 let odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody. Po pravomocn\u00e9m skon\u010den\u00ed v\u011bci vznikly t\u0159i nov\u00e9 nez\u00e1visl\u00e9 znaleck\u00e9 posudky od ryze renomovan\u00e9 odborn\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti, kter\u00e9 p\u0159\u00ed\u010dinu smrti, tedy vra\u017edu elektrick\u00fdm proudem vyvracej\u00ed,<\/strong> a naopak napadaj\u00ed z\u00e1v\u011bry znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., a z\u00e1v\u011bry doc. Franti\u0161ka Vorla. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Na z\u00e1klad\u011b t\u011bchto znaleck\u00fdch posudk\u016f, kter\u00e9 zpochyb\u0148uj\u00ed, a to zcela kategoricky, z\u00e1v\u011bry znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., v \u010dele s tehdej\u0161\u00edm znalcem Franti\u0161kem Vorlem, nechala komunistick\u00e1 soudkyn\u011b JUDr. Renata Gilov\u00e1 napaden\u00e9 posudky Franti\u0161ka Vorla p\u0159ezkoumat toto\u017en\u00fdm znalcem Franti\u0161kem Vorlem a toto\u017en\u00fdm znaleck\u00fdm \u00fastavem. Co\u017e je zcela bezprecedentn\u00ed \u00faskok p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b sen\u00e1tu, kter\u00fd v\u0161ak byl jedin\u00fdm mo\u017en\u00fdm postupem, proto\u017ee p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b sen\u00e1tu JUDr. Renata Gilov\u00e1 v\u011bd\u011bla, \u017ee by se pod z\u00e1v\u011br o vra\u017ed\u011b elektrick\u00fdm proudem jin\u00fd znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav nepodepsal. (Zdroj<\/a>) <\/p>\n\n\n\n Novelou z\u00e1kona \u010d. 37\/1967 Sb., o seznamu znalc\u016f a znaleck\u00fdch \u00fastav\u016f, kter\u00e9 vede Ministerstvo spravedlnosti, bylo spolkem \u0160alamoun jako novum<\/strong> zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee jak znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., tak ani p\u0159ednosta t\u00e9to nemocnice ji\u017e nejsou zaps\u00e1ni<\/strong>, jak v seznamu znaleck\u00fdch \u00fastav\u016f, tak v seznamu znalc\u016f v odv\u011btv\u00ed soudn\u00edho l\u00e9ka\u0159stv\u00ed. (Zdroj<\/a>) <\/p>\n\n\n\n Spolek \u0160alamoun zcela z\u00e1sadn\u011b zpochyb\u0148uje, \u017ee znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., lege artis<\/em><\/strong> a de iure<\/em><\/strong> v\u016fbec n\u011bkdy vznikl. Z velmi rozs\u00e1hl\u00e9 korespondence ot\u00e1zek a odpov\u011bd\u00ed mezi spolkem \u0160alamoun a Ministerstvem spravedlnosti, kter\u00fd \u010d\u00edt\u00e1 v\u00edce jak 300 stran, vy\u0161lo najevo, \u017ee dv\u011b esenci\u00e1ln\u00ed podm\u00ednky pro vznik tohoto znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu nikdy nebyly spln\u011bny. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Kompletn\u00ed \u010dasov\u00e1 osa p\u0159\u00edpadu Petra Kramn\u00e9ho (Zdroj<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Napaden\u00fd znaleck\u00fd posudek Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., a doc. Vorla hr\u00e1l zcela z\u00e1sadn\u00ed roli v dal\u0161\u00ed trestn\u00ed v\u011bci, a to znalc\u016f MUDr. Matlacha a MUDr. Farga\u0161e, kter\u00e1 je doslova pupe\u010dn\u00ed \u0161\u0148\u016frou spojena s kauzou P. Kramn\u00e9ho. Ji\u017e neuv\u011b\u0159iteln\u00fdch 5 let prov\u011b\u0159uje Policie \u010cR – Moravskoslezk\u00e9ho kraje podn\u011bt spolku \u0160alamoun v\u016f\u010di znaleck\u00e9mu \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., a doc. Vorlovi za zkreslen\u00fd, \u010di nepravdiv\u00fd znaleck\u00fd posudek dle \u00a7 346 Trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku. Mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b jednoduch\u00e9 prov\u011b\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed nabralo po 5 letech ne\u010dekan\u00fd sm\u011br a byl jsem p\u0159ed ned\u00e1vnou dobou podat vysv\u011btlen\u00ed, kde jsem dolo\u017eil, \u017ee z\u00e1v\u011bry doc. Vorla a znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., jsou p\u0159inejlep\u0161\u00edm zkreslen\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Nem\u016f\u017eeme zat\u00edm jednozna\u010dn\u011b potvrdit co vedlo ke konci znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., a doc. Vorla, ale pozitivn\u00ed zpr\u00e1vou je ta skute\u010dnost, \u017ee znalec Franti\u0161ek Vorel a znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., ji\u017e nad\u00e1le nem\u016f\u017eou ni\u010dit lidsk\u00e9 \u017eivoty, proto\u017ee opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00ed ke sv\u00e9 znaleck\u00e9 \u010dinnosti ji\u017e pozbyli.<\/p>\n\n\n\n P\u0159\u00edpad Petra Kramn\u00e9ho, kter\u00fd spolek \u0160alamoun monitoruje ji\u017e \u0159adu let, m\u00e1 dal\u0161\u00ed z\u00e1sadn\u00ed v\u00fdvoj v cel\u00e9 kauze. Rekapitulace p\u0159\u00edpadu Petr […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1156,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,12,165,164,162],"tags":[49,20,48],"class_list":["post-1131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-archiv","category-kauza-kramny","category-media-a-justice","category-trestni-rizeni","category-znalecke-posudky","tag-gilova","tag-kramny","tag-vorel"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1131"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1131"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1131\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1158,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1131\/revisions\/1158"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/20191114084738_kramny-vorel.jpg\")
1<\/strong>. Tento \u00fadajn\u00fd znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav a ani Ministerstvo spravedlnosti \u010cR nebylo schopno<\/strong><\/span> dolo\u017eit konstitutivn\u00ed rozhodnut\u00ed ministra spravedlnosti o vzniku tohoto \u00fastavu.
2<\/strong>. Tento znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav v rozporu s tehdy platn\u00fdm z\u00e1konem \u010d. 36\/1967 Sb., nikdy nebyl<\/span><\/strong> zaps\u00e1n v \u00dast\u0159edn\u00edm v\u011bstn\u00edku \u010cR.
Ve v\u00fdsledku bylo zji\u0161t\u011bno a dolo\u017eeno, \u017ee znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., zah\u00e1jil \u010dinnost a\u017e v roce 2009, kdy vypracov\u00e1val znaleck\u00e9 posudky na zcela bagateln\u00ed trestn\u00e9 \u010diny, kdy \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd z t\u011bchto trestn\u00fdch \u010din\u016f neskon\u010dil nepodm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdm odsouzen\u00edm, a prvn\u00ed velk\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad tohoto znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu, kdy horn\u00ed trestn\u00ed sazba p\u0159esahovala v\u00fdm\u011bru vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed jak 5 let, byl pr\u00e1v\u011b p\u0159\u00edpad P. Kramn\u00e9ho. S p\u0159\u00edpadem P. Kramn\u00e9ho tento znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav z\u00e1rove\u0148 i skon\u010dil.
Nast\u00e1v\u00e1 dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru zcela bezprecedentn\u00ed stav, kdy dodatek ke znaleck\u00e9mu posudku Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., kter\u00fd vznikl na z\u00e1klad\u011b t\u0159\u00ed nov\u00fdch znaleck\u00fdch posudk\u016f a kter\u00fd dosud nikdy nebyl proveden p\u0159ed soudem, vypracoval subjekt v \u010dele s jeho p\u0159ednostou, je\u017e oba ukon\u010dili znaleckou \u010dinnost a tud\u00ed\u017e tento znaleck\u00fd posudek ji\u017e de iure nemohou osv\u011bd\u010dit u soudu.
Nepochybn\u011b i sprost\u00fd odsouzen\u00fd P. Kramn\u00fd m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo kl\u00e1st zpracovatel\u016fm znaleck\u00e9ho posudku, tedy z\u00e1stupc\u016fm znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu, ot\u00e1zky.
Z pohledu spolku \u0160alamoun nen\u00ed a\u017e tak rozhodn\u00e9, kdy byl znaleck\u00fd posudek znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu vypracov\u00e1n, ale rozhodn\u00e9 je, kdy byl proveden u soudu jako d\u016fkaz, co\u017e se dosud nestalo<\/strong>. A vzhledem k tomu, \u017ee v mezidob\u00ed znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav i zpracovatel ukon\u010dili \u010dinnost, se tak ani nestane.
<\/p>\n\n\n\nKauza znalc\u016f MUDr. Matlacha a MUDr. Farga\u0161e <\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Meritem jejich trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed bylo \u00fadajn\u00e9 chybn\u00e9 vyhodnocen\u00ed histologick\u00e9ho prepar\u00e1tu \u010d. 21 (st\u0159eva Moniky Kramn\u00e9), kdy znalci \u00fadajn\u011b chybn\u011b poukazuj\u00ed na z\u00e1n\u011btliv\u00e9 polynukle\u00e1ry ve st\u0159evech Moniky Kramn\u00e9.
V pr\u016fb\u011bhu jejich trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed vy\u0161lo najevo (a\u010d je to zcela nemo\u017en\u00e9), \u017ee prepar\u00e1t \u010d. 21, kter\u00fd popisuj\u00ed znalci Matlach – Farga\u0161 je zcela jin\u00fd prepar\u00e1t<\/span><\/strong> ne\u017e popisuje znaleck\u00fd \u00fastav Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., a doc. Vorel (sic!), a\u010d v\u0161ak nese zcela toto\u017en\u00e9 \u010d\u00edslo 21.
S ohledem na pr\u00e1vn\u00ed kvalifikaci nastal proces s dosud bez\u00fahonn\u00fdmi l\u00e9ka\u0159i u Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b za p\u0159edsednictv\u00ed samosoudkyn\u011b s titulem Mgr., kter\u00fd nese p\u0159\u00edsn\u00e9 srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s p\u0159ipraven\u00fdmi procesy z 50. let.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/spoleksalamoun.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/20181012153418_gilova-h.jpg\")
<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n
I p\u0159es z\u00e1sadn\u00ed zcela odborn\u00e9 rozpory (prepar\u00e1t \u010d. 21) a nov\u00e9 znaleck\u00e9 posudky renomovan\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti, samosoudkyn\u011b Mgr. Petra Ritterov\u00e1 nenechala v trestn\u00ed v\u011bci „sprost\u00fdch“ l\u00e9ka\u0159\u016f a znalc\u016f vypracovat ani jeden<\/span><\/strong> znaleck\u00fd posudek \u010di odborn\u00e9 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed a z panick\u00e9 obavy dokonce nep\u0159edvolala ani jednoho sv\u011bdka, nedej bo\u017ee znalce<\/strong><\/span>, aby se n\u00e1hodou sprost\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00ed nemohli domoci sv\u00fdch element\u00e1rn\u00edch pr\u00e1v.
Zad\u00e1n\u00ed zn\u011blo jasn\u011b a doslova – za ka\u017edou cenu. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Jedin\u00fdm d\u016fkazem, op\u011bt zcela ne\u010dekan\u011b, byl toto\u017en\u00fd posudek pr\u00e1v\u011b znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu Nemocnice \u010cesk\u00e9 Bud\u011bjovice, a.s., a doc. Vorla. Tedy d\u016fkazem byl listinn\u00fd d\u016fkaz ze zcela jin\u00e9 trestn\u00ed v\u011bci, a to posudek z kauzy Petra Kramn\u00e9ho, kdy tento „\u00fadajn\u00fd“ posudek neobsahoval<\/span><\/strong> znaleckou dolo\u017eku, byl podeps\u00e1n neopr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00fdmi osobami<\/strong> a m\u011bl \u0161patnou znaleckou pe\u010de\u0165<\/span><\/strong>, nota bene ze znaleck\u00e9ho \u00fastavu, kter\u00fd dle na\u0161eho n\u00e1zoru nikdy de iure nevznikl.<\/strong>
Ostatn\u011b i na p\u0159\u00edpadu Ing. G\u00e1by je v\u00edce ne\u017e patrno, \u017ee v „Ostrav\u011b“ je mo\u017en\u00e9 naprosto v\u0161e. (Zdroj<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\nZnaleck\u00fd \u00fastav a znalec doc. Vorel ji\u017e 5 let d\u016fvodn\u011b podez\u0159el\u00ed<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/pre>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"